Anastasios Karakassides, Lauri Suominen, Hirotaka Inoue, Ghulam Yasin, Esko I. Kauppinen. “Systematic mapping of bimetallic catalyst combinations for floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes.” ChemRxiv (). https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.15007442/v1

SWCNT films from the Fe-based catalyst series
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Sn R90 = 735 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.60 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Zn R90 = 812 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.50 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Al R90 = 831 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.60 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Ba R90 = 490 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.61 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Ce R90 = 499 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.79 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Nd R90 = 838 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.86 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Sm R90 = 840 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.79 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Cu R90 = 469 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.80 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Mn R90 = 383 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.70 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Gd R90 = 845 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.84 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Tb R90 = 829 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.82 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Co R90 = 595 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.82 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe R90 = 603 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.92 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Pd R90 = 705 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.80 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Ti R90 = 831 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.70 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Pt R90 = 504 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.80 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Zr R90 = 1024 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.50 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Cr R90 = 619 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.94 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–V R90 = 851 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.70 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Ru R90 = 772 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.80 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Mo R90 = 1433 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.80 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–Re R90 = 6131 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.80 nm
Four-point probe and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy, Fe–W R90 = 965 Ω/sq; modal diameter = 1.70 nm
SI, pp. 2–3
SWCNT bundle-length distributions from the Fe-based catalyst series
SEM, Fe–Sn geometric mean = 2.6 μm; geometric SD = 2.3; +ΔY = 3.2 μm; −ΔY = 1.4 μm; kurtosis = 11.5; skewness = 2.9; average = 3.6 ± 3.7 μm
SEM, Fe–Zn geometric mean = 5.6 μm; geometric SD = 2.2; +ΔY = 7.0 μm; −ΔY = 3.1 μm; kurtosis = 3.8; skewness = 1.8; average = 7.7 ± 6.6 μm
SEM, Fe–Al geometric mean = 8.2 μm; geometric SD = 2.0; +ΔY = 8.4 μm; −ΔY = 4.2 μm; kurtosis = 3.6; skewness = 1.8; average = 10.5 ± 8.1 μm
SEM, Fe–Ba geometric mean = 13.2 μm; geometric SD = 1.9; +ΔY = 11.6 μm; −ΔY = 6.2 μm; kurtosis = 2.3; skewness = 1.4; average = 16.1 ± 10.5 μm
SEM, Fe–Ce geometric mean = 7.3 μm; geometric SD = 1.9; +ΔY = 6.5 μm; −ΔY = 3.5 μm; kurtosis = 2.1; skewness = 1.3; average = 8.8 ± 5.3 μm
SEM, Fe–Nd geometric mean = 5.0 μm; geometric SD = 2.3; +ΔY = 6.5 μm; −ΔY = 2.8 μm; kurtosis = 12.5; skewness = 3.1; average = 7.2 ± 7.5 μm
SEM, Fe–Sm geometric mean = 4.2 μm; geometric SD = 1.8; +ΔY = 3.6 μm; −ΔY = 2.0 μm; kurtosis = 0.8; skewness = 1.0; average = 5.1 ± 2.9 μm
SEM, Fe–Cu geometric mean = 4.0 μm; geometric SD = 2.3; +ΔY = 5.2 μm; −ΔY = 2.3 μm; kurtosis = 3.2; skewness = 1.8; average = 5.6 ± 4.9 μm
SEM, Fe–Mn geometric mean = 8.1 μm; geometric SD = 2.2; +ΔY = 9.5 μm; −ΔY = 4.4 μm; kurtosis = 2.6; skewness = 1.5; average = 10.7 ± 8.2 μm
SEM, Fe–Gd geometric mean = 1.4 μm; geometric SD = 1.9; +ΔY = 1.4 μm; −ΔY = 0.7 μm; kurtosis = 4.2; skewness = 1.8; average = 1.8 ± 1.3 μm
SEM, Fe–Tb geometric mean = 2.7 μm; geometric SD = 2.2; +ΔY = 3.1 μm; −ΔY = 1.4 μm; kurtosis = 6.1; skewness = 2.2; average = 3.6 ± 3.1 μm
SEM, Fe–Co geometric mean = 4.6 μm; geometric SD = 1.9; +ΔY = 4.2 μm; −ΔY = 2.2 μm; kurtosis = 1.1; skewness = 1.2; average = 5.6 ± 3.6 μm
SEM, Fe geometric mean = 5.4 μm; geometric SD = 2.0; +ΔY = 5.4 μm; −ΔY = 2.7 μm; kurtosis = 5.4; skewness = 1.8; average = 6.7 ± 4.7 μm
SEM, Fe–Pd geometric mean = 8.2 μm; geometric SD = 1.9; +ΔY = 7.0 μm; −ΔY = 3.8 μm; kurtosis = 8.6; skewness = 2.3; average = 9.9 ± 6.6 μm
SEM, Fe–Ti geometric mean = 9.9 μm; geometric SD = 2.1; +ΔY = 10.9 μm; −ΔY = 5.2 μm; kurtosis = -0.4; skewness = 0.6; average = 13 ± 7.8 μm
SEM, Fe–Pt geometric mean = 5.5 μm; geometric SD = 2.4; +ΔY = 7.5 μm; −ΔY = 3.2 μm; kurtosis = 4.1; skewness = 1.8; average = 7.6 ± 6.4 μm
SEM, Fe–Zr geometric mean = 5.8 μm; geometric SD = 2.2; +ΔY = 7.1 μm; −ΔY = 3.2 μm; kurtosis = 2.5; skewness = 1.5; average = 7.7 ± 5.8 μm
SEM, Fe–Cr geometric mean = 5.1 μm; geometric SD = 1.7; +ΔY = 3.5 μm; −ΔY = 2.1 μm; kurtosis = 3.1; skewness = 1.6; average = 5.8 ± 3.3 μm
SEM, Fe–V geometric mean = 7.4 μm; geometric SD = 2.1; +ΔY = 8.1 μm; −ΔY = 3.9 μm; kurtosis = 11.6; skewness = 2.9; average = 9.9 ± 9.0 μm
SEM, Fe–Ru geometric mean = 7.1 μm; geometric SD = 2.2; +ΔY = 8.8 μm; −ΔY = 3.9 μm; kurtosis = 5.2; skewness = 2.0; average = 9.7 ± 8.3 μm
SEM, Fe–Mo geometric mean = 9.8 μm; geometric SD = 2.0; +ΔY = 10.3 μm; −ΔY = 5.0 μm; kurtosis = 5.0; skewness = 1.9; average = 12.7 ± 9.8 μm
SEM, Fe–Re geometric mean = 4.6 μm; geometric SD = 2.3; +ΔY = 6.0 μm; −ΔY = 2.6 μm; kurtosis = 6.0; skewness = 2.3; average = 6.5 ± 6.1 μm
SEM, Fe–W geometric mean = 5.8 μm; geometric SD = 2.4; +ΔY = 8.0 μm; −ΔY = 3.4 μm; kurtosis = 6.7; skewness = 2.3; average = 8.4 ± 7.9 μm
SI, pp. 4–5
SWCNTs grown with Fe catalyst
Raman spectroscopy (514 nm), main RBM peak approximately 130 cm⁻¹