| Identifier | 3a |
|---|---|
| Cyclic voltammetry, oxidative scan in DMF at 20 mV s⁻¹ | single, irreversible oxidation feature with an anodic peak current at +0.30 V vs Fc/Fc+ |
| Cyclic voltammetry, oxidative scans at 20–2000 mV s⁻¹ | no reversibility was observed at any of the scan rates tested; no reoxidation feature was observed |
| Cyclic voltammetry with 0–0.75 equivalents TBACl in 100 mM TBAPF6 in DMF at 20 mV s⁻¹ | completely irreversible trace, with no observable NiIII return reduction feature, and an increasingly larger cathodic shift of the peak as more TBACl was added |
| Cyclic voltammetry, current normalized to the square root of scan rate | higher normalized currents at slower scan rates; cathodic shift of the peak current as the scan rate decreased |
| Cyclic voltammetry with excess aryl chloride 10a | decrease in peak current |
| Cyclic voltammetry, reductive scan of 5 mM 3a in 100 mM NBu4PF6 in DMF at 150 mV s⁻¹ with 20 equivalents ArCl 10a or ArBr 10b | previously observed redox features collapsed into a single new irreversible catalytic wave at more reducing potentials |
| Square-wave voltammetry with 20 equivalents aryl bromide 10b in 100 mM NBu4PF6 in DMF | redox features observed without aryl halide were almost completely suppressed; small residual signals attributable to NiII(Ar)Cl and NiII(Ar)2 remained detectable at lower nickel concentrations; the dominant feature was a new irreversible reduction wave that increased in intensity and shifted to more cathodic potentials as nickel concentration increased |
Olivia R. Taylor, Tanner J. Megna, Ana Bahamonde. “Challenging the kinetic likelihood of bimolecular bipyridine-nickelIII aryl dihalide reactions.” ChemRxiv (). https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.15007463/v1
The main paper refers to supporting information, but no separate supporting information file was found among the files available from the ChemRxiv record
| Identifier | 3b |
|---|---|
| Cyclic voltammetry in DMF | traces were complicated by the presence of free bromide ion; inclusion of 1 equivalent NaPF6 in the electrolyte solution mitigated this issue |