| XRD (Cu Kα, λ = 1.5418 Å; 2θ = 10–90°; 5° min−1), all patterns | Dominated by three strong reflections at approximately 44.5°, 51.9°, and 76.4° |
|---|---|
| XRD, author assignments | (111), (200), and (220) reflections of the NF substrate |
| XRD, crystalline Ni(OH)2 or secondary-cation-containing phase | No distinct diffraction peaks were resolved |
Shihui Chen. “Transition-metal cation effects on electrodeposited Ni(OH)2 for urea electrolysis.” ChemRxiv (). https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.15007545/v1
Supporting information is appended to the main paper
| SEM (15 kV, 9 mm working distance), Ni(OH)2/NF | Interconnected nanosheets and micrometer-scale pores |
|---|---|
| SEM, representative Fe-containing deposits; nominal 4 % and 8 % bath precursor fractions shown | Smaller pores and greater fusion between adjacent features |
| SEM, Zn-containing deposits; nominal 2 % bath precursor fraction shown | Sheet-like morphology with more irregular pores |
| SEM, Co-containing deposits; nominal 6 % bath precursor fraction shown | Finer sponge-like porous texture |
| SEM, representative Mn-containing deposit; nominal 8 % bath precursor fraction shown | Comparatively dense and sheet-like |
| EIS (0.1–10⁵ Hz, initiated at 0.45 V vs Hg/HgO), Fe- and Zn-containing series | Predominantly single-semicircle responses |
|---|---|
| EIS (0.1–10⁵ Hz, initiated at 0.45 V vs Hg/HgO), Co- and Mn-containing series | An additional relaxation feature |
| EIS (0.1–10⁵ Hz, initiated at −1.11 V vs Hg/HgO) | Single-semicircle Nyquist responses for all electrodes |
|---|
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.620 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 15.5 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.600 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 15.0 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.839 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 21.0 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.701 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 17.5 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.636 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 15.9 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.594 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 14.9 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.777 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 19.4 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.492 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 12.3 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 1.090 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 27.2 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.648 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 16.2 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.822 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 20.6 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.860 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 21.5 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.928 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 23.2 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.846 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 21.2 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.931 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 23.3 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.810 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 20.3 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.904 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 22.6 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.754 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 18.9 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.490 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 12.3 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.442 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 11.1 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.527 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 13.2 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.230 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 5.75 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.756 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 18.9 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.662 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 16.6 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.810 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 20.3 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.675 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 16.9 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.704 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 17.6 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.717 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 17.9 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.801 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 20.0 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.707 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 17.7 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.735 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 18.4 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.660 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 16.5 cm² |
| UOR Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.778 mF |
|---|---|
| UOR apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 19.5 cm² |
| HER Cdl, estimated from non-faradaic CVs | 0.702 mF |
| HER apparent ECSA, estimated using Cs = 0.04 mF cm⁻² | 17.6 cm² |